SynthesisGenes2025
A Comprehensive Analysis Examining the Role of Genetic Influences on Psychotropic Medication Response in Children.
Synthesis in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacogenetics of antidepressant response: a focused review on CYP2C19, CYP2D6, SLC6A4, and HTR2A polymorphisms.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Epigenetic Mechanisms in Fabry Disease: A Thematic Analysis Linking Differential Methylation Profiles and Genetic Modifiers to Disease Phenotype.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psychotropic medication is commonly used for the treatment of mental health conditions. However, the genetic factors that influence psychotropic medication responses in children have not been thoroughly investigated. To address this gap, a systematic review and thematic analysis were conducted to examine the genetic impact of psychotropic medication response in children. The Down and Blacks and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklists assessed the quality of studies and health economics, respectively. Using PRISMA reporting guidelines, 50 articles were identified with a sample size ranging from 2 to 2.9 million individuals. Most of the studies reported on ethnicity, and approximately half of the studies (24/50) were performed in North America. Five themes emerged from the thematic analysis: (1) implications of non-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.