Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41010238›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Impact Factors on Oven-Dry Density Measurements of Wood.

Lukas Emmerich, Moritz Kampherm, Christian Brischke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lukas EmmerichWald und Holz NRW-Centre of Forest and Wood-Based Industries (FBV), Team Wood-Based Industries, Carlsauestraße 91A, D-59939 Olsberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2072-4722
Moritz KamphermWood Biology and Wood Products, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, University of Goettingen, Büsgenweg 4, D-37077 Goettingen, Germany.
Christian BrischkeThünen Institute of Wood Research, Leuschnerstraße 91d, D-21031 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4652-825X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wood density is a key property since it affects almost every other property of wood such as its elasto-mechanical, acoustic, thermal, or electrical properties. Hence, it is essential to determine wood density for the interpretation of any other property test. Density measurements are usually carried out gravimetrically by measuring the wood specimens' dimensions and taking their weight. In order to be independent of moisture, wood density is measured at an absolute dry state. However, depending on which wood properties shall be measured after the oven-dry density is determined, heating the wood up to 103 °C can be problematic because the volatile components of the wood can evaporate. For this reason, the drying conditions (temperature in °C (60, 80, 103 °C)), duration in h (8, 16, 24, 48 h)) required to achieve an absolute dry state inside wood specimens-being obligatory for the analysis of various physical, mechanical, or even biological properties-were examined for different softwood and hardwood species. Basically, oven-dry measurements (i.e., 48 h at 103 °C) themselves contained a significant error, which was considered to be the result of deviations in the handling of the specimens and the scales used. Using temperatures below 103 °C was critical for the determination of absolute dry mass and dimensions. Wood specimens with a high content of volatile ingredients led to an apparently increased residual MC (e.g., shown for Scots pine heartwood), thus volatile ingredients were considered an additional source of error during oven-dry measurements.

Indexed as

absolute dry densitydurability testingevaporationhardwoodssoftwoods

Identifiers

PMID41010238
PMCPMC12471828

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.