ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Tenecteplase-What Have We Learned till Now? A Narrative Review.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tenecteplase (TNK), a genetically modified tissue plasminogen activator, has emerged as a promising alternative to alteplase (ALT) for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Our aim was to synthesize the current clinical evidence on TNK use in AIS patients, comparing efficacy, safety, and workflow benefits to ALT. A narrative review was conducted by searching PubMed and Scopus (January 2024-March 2025) for studies comparing TNK and ALT in AIS. A total of 35 eligible papers were included. Data were grouped by treatment scenario: IVT-only, bridging before endovascular therapy (EVT), and intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT). The results showed that TNK is non-inferior-and in some analyses, superior-to ALT regarding functional outcomes, especially in large vessel occlusion. TNK facilitates shorter treatment delays due to its single-bolus administration. While some trials report higher rates of intracranial hemorrhage, overall safety and mortality are comparable. In conclusion, TNK appears to exert equivalent or superior efficacy and safety compared to ALT in multiple AIS scenarios. Its pharmacological and logistical advantages support its broader clinical adoption. Further trials are needed, especially for IAT, central retinal artery occlusion, and patients on dabigatran.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.