Trial reportNutrients2025
Effects of
Trial report in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07546513 (Effects of Cistanche Supplementation on Anaerobic Exercise Performance and Recovery in Men With Different Athletic Training Levels), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Cistanche Supplementation on Anaerobic Exercise Performance and Recovery in Men With Different Athletic Training Levels: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effects of
methodsA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted with 48 male participants, including 24 resistance-trained and 24 untrained individuals. Participants were stratified by training status and randomly assigned to either the CD or placebo (PLAC) group. All subjects completed a standardized resistance training program three times per week for eight weeks. The CD group received 5 g of CD extract twice daily, while the PLAC group consumed a matched placebo. Assessments included one-repetition maximum (1RM) for bench press and squat, maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), and repetitions to failure (RTF). Blood biomarkers including serum testosterone, cortisol, C-reactive protein (CRP), and creatine kinase (CK) were also measured.
resultsNo significant differences in dietary energy intake or macro-nutrient composition were observed based on two 5-day dietary records collected before baseline testing and at the end of the intervention. Among untrained individuals, the CD group showed significantly greater improvements in 1RM bench press and squat compared with the PLAC group (
conclusionsDaily supplementation with 5 g of CD extract for eight consecutive weeks significantly enhanced muscle strength and endurance in males with different training backgrounds and facilitated post-exercise recovery by modulating hormonal responses and reducing stress levels and inflammation. These findings provide experimental evidence supporting the application of CD in sports nutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.