ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Wearable Sensors for the Assessment of Functional Outcome Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refining Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: From Implant Design to Patient-Specific Strategy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review assessed the current use of wearable sensors in monitoring recovery following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A systematic search of electronic databases was undertaken (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science) between 2005 and 2024 following the PRISMA-ScR protocol. Studies were eligible if they were peer reviewed, available in full text, and reported the use of wearable sensors to evaluate shoulder motion or activity in postoperative RSA patients. Fifty-seven studies were identified, of which six met the inclusion criteria. Studies were either focused on assessing shoulder motion (n = 3) or on measuring upper limb activity counts or activity intensities (n = 3); however the calculation of output variables were different across most studies. Sensors were positioned on the operated upper arm in all studies, though sensor placement on the sternum and the wrist varied. Session durations ranged from 24 h to continuous monitoring beyond seven days. Daily wear times were most commonly during full waking hours. The large variation in wearable sensor configuration, testing protocols, and the calculation of output variables limited the comparability across studies. Standardization in sensor protocols and outcomes is required to enable the reliable wearable assessment of postoperative recovery after RSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.