Evidence mapPaperPMID 41010606Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Wearable Sensors for the Assessment of Functional Outcome Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Peter K Edwards, Jay R Ebert, William G Blakeney, Stefan Bauer, Allan W Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter K EdwardsSchool of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4032-1346
Jay R EbertSchool of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5843-6243
William G BlakeneyRoyal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA 6000, Australia.
Stefan BauerDepartment of Surgery, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8235-0287
Allan W WangDepartment of Surgery, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review assessed the current use of wearable sensors in monitoring recovery following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A systematic search of electronic databases was undertaken (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science) between 2005 and 2024 following the PRISMA-ScR protocol. Studies were eligible if they were peer reviewed, available in full text, and reported the use of wearable sensors to evaluate shoulder motion or activity in postoperative RSA patients. Fifty-seven studies were identified, of which six met the inclusion criteria. Studies were either focused on assessing shoulder motion (n = 3) or on measuring upper limb activity counts or activity intensities (n = 3); however the calculation of output variables were different across most studies. Sensors were positioned on the operated upper arm in all studies, though sensor placement on the sternum and the wrist varied. Session durations ranged from 24 h to continuous monitoring beyond seven days. Daily wear times were most commonly during full waking hours. The large variation in wearable sensor configuration, testing protocols, and the calculation of output variables limited the comparability across studies. Standardization in sensor protocols and outcomes is required to enable the reliable wearable assessment of postoperative recovery after RSA.

Indexed as

functioninertial measurement unitsmovementreverse shoulder arthroplastytechnology

Identifiers

PMID41010606
PMCPMC12470674

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.