ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Dyslipidemia Treatment in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Is It Time to Move to Combination Therapy?
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dyslipidemia is a major modifiable risk factor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and effective management is essential to reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Recent guidelines emphasize early, intensive lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and increasingly recommend combination regimens to achieve ambitious low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets. This review evaluates current evidence and recommendations for dyslipidemia treatment in ACS, with a focus on the rationale, timing, and selection of combination therapy. We conducted a comprehensive review of recent clinical guidelines, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies addressing lipid management in ACS. The analysis included data on LDL-C targets, efficacy and safety of high-intensity statins, adjunctive non-statin therapies (ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors), and the impact of dietary interventions. Early and intensive LLT, initiated within 24-48 h of ACS, is associated with significant reductions in recurrent events and mortality. High-intensity statins (atorvastatin 40-80 mg or rosuvastatin 20-40 mg) are first-line, with combination therapy (statin plus ezetimibe and/or PCSK9 inhibitor) recommended for patients not achieving LDL-C < 1.4 mmol/L (<55 mg/dL) or >50% reduction from baseline. Evidence supports further LDL-C lowering (<1.0 mmol/L) in very high-risk patients. The Mediterranean and DASH diets provide additional benefit in lipid profile optimization and risk reduction. Statins also confer pleiotropic effects, including anti-inflammatory and plaque-stabilizing actions. Recent studies and real-world data confirm the efficacy and safety of combination approaches but highlight the need for individualized therapy based on residual risk, comorbidities, and tolerability. Achieving guideline-recommended LDL-C targets in ACS patients often requires early initiation of combination lipid-lowering therapy. Optimal management should be individualized considering both LDL-C levels and broader risk profiles. Ongoing research is needed to refine patient selection for combination therapy and to integrate novel agents into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.