Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41010807›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Pathophysiology, Risk Stratification, and Ablation Strategies.

Giuseppe Sgarito, Francesco Campo, Sergio Sciacca, Michele Pilato, Manlio Cipriani, Sergio Conti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giuseppe SgaritoIRCCS Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6003-6054
Francesco CampoIRCCS Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Sergio SciaccaIRCCS Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Michele PilatoIRCCS Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Manlio CiprianiIRCCS Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0632-0561
Sergio ContiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care Center, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA 52242, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6683-6781

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are common and clinically important complications in patients supported by left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), occurring in up to 50% of cases within the first year after implantation. Despite the hemodynamic support provided by LVADs, VAs are linked to increased morbidity and mortality, primarily through recurrent implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks and right ventricular failure. The underlying mechanisms of VAs in this population are multifactorial, involving structural myocardial remodeling, device-related factors, and pre-existing arrhythmic substrates. Catheter ablation has become a valuable treatment option when antiarrhythmic drug therapy and device reprogramming are inadequate, though procedural timing (pre-, intra-, or post-implantation) and approaches remain under discussion. Epicardial access during LVAD surgery may provide advantages for selected patients, while ablation after implantation poses technical challenges due to altered anatomy and electromagnetic interference. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk stratification, and management of VAs in LVAD recipients, emphasizing technical considerations, procedural safety, and clinical outcomes of catheter ablation. A multidisciplinary approach remains essential in guiding personalized treatment and optimizing outcomes for this complex population. Undergoing studies will provide more insight into optimal management of arrhythmias, particularly regarding the optimal timing of catheter ablation. The impact of new technologies such as non-invasive mapping alongside pre-procedural imaging needs also to be further evaluated.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationElectrical StormHeart FailureLeft Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD)Ventricular Arrhythmias

Identifiers

PMID41010807
PMCPMC12470985

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.