ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Pathophysiology, Risk Stratification, and Ablation Strategies.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- HeartMate 3-related ECG artefact resolved by 40‑Hz low‑pass filtering.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are common and clinically important complications in patients supported by left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), occurring in up to 50% of cases within the first year after implantation. Despite the hemodynamic support provided by LVADs, VAs are linked to increased morbidity and mortality, primarily through recurrent implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks and right ventricular failure. The underlying mechanisms of VAs in this population are multifactorial, involving structural myocardial remodeling, device-related factors, and pre-existing arrhythmic substrates. Catheter ablation has become a valuable treatment option when antiarrhythmic drug therapy and device reprogramming are inadequate, though procedural timing (pre-, intra-, or post-implantation) and approaches remain under discussion. Epicardial access during LVAD surgery may provide advantages for selected patients, while ablation after implantation poses technical challenges due to altered anatomy and electromagnetic interference. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk stratification, and management of VAs in LVAD recipients, emphasizing technical considerations, procedural safety, and clinical outcomes of catheter ablation. A multidisciplinary approach remains essential in guiding personalized treatment and optimizing outcomes for this complex population. Undergoing studies will provide more insight into optimal management of arrhythmias, particularly regarding the optimal timing of catheter ablation. The impact of new technologies such as non-invasive mapping alongside pre-procedural imaging needs also to be further evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.