ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025
The Role of Biomarkers and Clinical Prediction Tools in the Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Syndromes: A Literature-Based Review.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- LINC00152/miR-145-5p/KLF4 ceRNA Axis: Diagnostic and Prognostic Value in Aortic Dissection.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of aortic dissection-related health information on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional content analysis study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Type 2 Diabetes Is Associated with Increased Coagulation Activity in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A D-Dimer-Based Analysis.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Aortic dissection as a disease of vascular wall homeostasis: integrating vasa vasorum-inflammation-metabolism axis for mechanistic insight and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Integrated biomarker model based on cTnI, BNP, and D-dimer for early risk stratification in acute aortic dissection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute aortic syndromes (AAS) include a spectrum of life-threatening conditions that pose considerable diagnostic challenges, particularly in emergency care settings. Clinical scores and circulating biomarkers have become essential in improving diagnostic accuracy, risk stratification, and guiding clinical decision-making. Tools such as the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score (ADD-RS) and the AORTAs score offer structured methods for identifying patients at elevated risk; however, their diagnostic performance can be further enhanced through integration with biomarker testing and imaging modalities. Biomarkers including D-dimer, NT-proBNP, cardiac troponins, and novel candidates such as soluble ST2 (sST2) and matrix metalloproteinase-8 and 9 (MMP-8, MMP-9), have demonstrated potential in refining diagnostic and prognostic assessments with an outstanding sensibility. ADAMTS-1 and ADAMTS-4 appear to have the best diagnostic accuracy, whereas certain non-coding DNAs (miR-15a) achieve an exceptionally high negative predictive value. These biomarkers reflect key underlying mechanisms such as inflammation, oxidative stress, and vascular injury, offering valuable insights into disease severity and progression. However, limitations related to specificity, inter-cohort variability, and assay standardization currently hinder their widespread clinical adoption. Further validation through large-scale, multi-center studies is essential to establish their role within integrated diagnostic pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.