Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41010942›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025

The Role of Biomarkers and Clinical Prediction Tools in the Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Syndromes: A Literature-Based Review.

Giulia Pignataro, Alice Scafetta, Donatella De Luca, Laura Simeoli, Andrea Piccioni, Veronica Ojetti, Francesco Franceschi, Marcello Candelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. LINC00152/miR-145-5p/KLF4 ceRNA Axis: Diagnostic and Prognostic Value in Aortic Dissection.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giulia PignataroEmergency, Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3394-3913
Alice ScafettaEmergency, Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Donatella De LucaEmergency, Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Laura SimeoliEmergency, Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Andrea PiccioniEmergency, Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5703-8737
Veronica OjettiDepartment of Internal Medicine, UniCamillus International Medical University of Rome, 00131 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8953-0707
Francesco FranceschiEmergency, Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Marcello CandelliEmergency, Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8443-7880

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute aortic syndromes (AAS) include a spectrum of life-threatening conditions that pose considerable diagnostic challenges, particularly in emergency care settings. Clinical scores and circulating biomarkers have become essential in improving diagnostic accuracy, risk stratification, and guiding clinical decision-making. Tools such as the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score (ADD-RS) and the AORTAs score offer structured methods for identifying patients at elevated risk; however, their diagnostic performance can be further enhanced through integration with biomarker testing and imaging modalities. Biomarkers including D-dimer, NT-proBNP, cardiac troponins, and novel candidates such as soluble ST2 (sST2) and matrix metalloproteinase-8 and 9 (MMP-8, MMP-9), have demonstrated potential in refining diagnostic and prognostic assessments with an outstanding sensibility. ADAMTS-1 and ADAMTS-4 appear to have the best diagnostic accuracy, whereas certain non-coding DNAs (miR-15a) achieve an exceptionally high negative predictive value. These biomarkers reflect key underlying mechanisms such as inflammation, oxidative stress, and vascular injury, offering valuable insights into disease severity and progression. However, limitations related to specificity, inter-cohort variability, and assay standardization currently hinder their widespread clinical adoption. Further validation through large-scale, multi-center studies is essential to establish their role within integrated diagnostic pathways.

Indexed as

Aortic DiseasesBiomarkersAcute Aortic SyndromeAcute DiseaseAortic DissectionFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansInterleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 ProteinNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsPredictive Value of TestsSyndromeBiomarkersFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DInterleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 ProteinNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)acute aortic syndromeaortic dissectionbiomarkerdiagnosisscore

Identifiers

PMID41010942
PMCPMC12472152

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.