ReviewMicromachines2025
Nanomaterial-Powered Biosensors: A Cutting-Edge Review of Their Versatile Applications.
Review in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimal sensing devices exhibit a combination of key performance attributes, including an extensive detection limit, exceptional selectivity, high sensitivity, consistent repeatability, precise measurement, and rapid response times with efficient analyte flow. In recent years, biosensing platforms incorporating nanoscale materials have garnered considerable attention due to their diverse applications across various scientific and technological domains. The integration of nanoparticles (NPs) in biosensor design primarily bridges the dimensional gap between the signal transduction element and the biological recognition component, both of which operate at nanometer scales. The synergistic combination of NPs with electrochemical techniques has facilitated the development of biosensors characterized by enhanced sensitivity and superior analyte discrimination capabilities. This comprehensive analysis examines the evolution and recent advancements in nanomaterial (NM)-based biosensors, encompassing an extensive array of nanostructures. These consists of one-dimensional nanostructures including carbon nanotubes (CNTs), nanowires (NWs), nanorods (NRs), and quantum dots (QDs), as well as noble metal and metal and metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs). The article examines how advancements in biosensing techniques across a range of applications have been fueled by the growth of nanotechnology. Researchers have significantly improved biosensor performance parameters by utilizing the distinct physiochemical properties of these NMs. The developments have increased the potential uses of nanobiosensors in a wide range of fields, from food safety and biodefense to medical diagnostics and environmental monitoring. The continuous developments in NM-based biosensors are the result of the integration of several scientific areas, such as analytical chemistry, materials science, and biotechnology. This interdisciplinary approach continues to drive innovations in sensor design, signal amplification strategies, and data analysis techniques, ultimately leading to more sophisticated and capable biosensing platforms. As the field progresses, challenges related to the scalability, reproducibility, and long-term stability of nanobiosensors are being addressed through innovative fabrication methods and surface modification techniques. These efforts aim to translate the promising results observed in laboratory settings into practical, commercially viable biosensing devices that can address real-world analytical challenges across various sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.