Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41012133›Full record

ReviewVaccines2025

Immune Response to MVA-BN Vaccination for Mpox: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Joanne Byrne, Patrick D M C Katoto, Bruce Kirenga, Wilber Sabiiti, Andrew Obuku, Virginie Gautier, Patrick W G Mallon, Eoin R Feeney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Durability of the Humoral Response to MPXV Infection.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joanne ByrneCentre for Experimental Pathogen Host Research (CEPHR), University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0184-0947
Patrick D M C KatotoCenter for Tropical Diseases and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Bukavu, Bukavu 73, Congo.ORCID 0000-0002-0553-201X
Bruce KirengaVaccine and Epidemics Research Group, Makerere University Lung Institute, Kampala P.O. Box 22412, Uganda.
Wilber SabiitiDivision of Infection and Global Health, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4742-2791
Andrew ObukuMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe P.O. Box 49, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-8255-8822
Virginie GautierCentre for Experimental Pathogen Host Research (CEPHR), University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1862-2644
Patrick W G MallonCentre for Experimental Pathogen Host Research (CEPHR), University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.
Eoin R FeeneyCentre for Experimental Pathogen Host Research (CEPHR), University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4118-4945

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2022 global mpox outbreak, caused by clade IIb of the monkeypox virus (MPXV), prompted emergency use authorisation of the Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) vaccine, previously approved for smallpox prevention. Understanding immune responses to the MVA-BN vaccine is critical to inform both current and future mpox vaccine policy, particularly amid reports of breakthrough infections in vaccinated persons, uncertainty about the durability of vaccine-induced protection, and the emergence of further outbreaks of mpox from different viral clades, including the clade I-driven public health emergency of international concern. MVA-BN elicits binding and neutralising antibody, memory B cells, and T cell responses. Immune responses vary by host factors, prior orthopoxvirus exposure, and dosing regimens. While seroconversion is generally robust, circulating antibody titres often wane rapidly, particularly in vaccinia-naïve and/or immunocompromised individuals, including people with HIV. Vaccine-induced neutralising antibody responses to MPXV are frequently lower than to vaccinia virus, and their role in protection remains ill-defined. In contrast, T cell responses appear more sustained and may support long-term immunity in the absence of persistent antibody titres. This narrative review synthesises current evidence on the immunogenicity and durability of MVA-BN vaccination, highlights challenges in assay interpretation, and outlines key research priorities, including the need to explore correlates of protection, booster strategies, and next-generation vaccine design.

Indexed as

antibodiesB cellsmonkeypox virusmpoxMVA-BN vaccineT cells

Identifiers

PMID41012133
PMCPMC12474463

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.