ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Smart System for Continuous Sitting Posture Monitoring, Assessment, and Personalized Feedback.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prolonged sitting and the adoption of unhealthy sitting postures have been a common issue generally seen among many adults and the working population in recent years. This alone has contributed to the alarming rise of various health issues, such as musculoskeletal disorders and a range of long-term health conditions. Hence, this study proposes the development of a novel smart-sensing chair system designed to analyze and provide actionable insights to help encourage better postural habits and promote well-being. The proposed system was equipped with two 32 × 32 pressure sensor mats, which were integrated into an office chair to facilitate the collection of postural data. Unlike traditional approaches that rely on generalized datasets collected from multiple healthy participants to train machine learning models, this study adopts a user-tailored methodology-collecting data from a single individual to account for their unique physiological characteristics and musculoskeletal conditions. The dataset was trained using five different machine learning models-Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)-to classify 19 distinct sitting postures. Overall, CNN achieved the highest accuracy, with 98.29%. To facilitate user engagement and support long-term behavior change, we developed SitWell-an intelligent postural feedback platform comprising both mobile and web applications. The platform's core features include sitting posture classification, posture duration analytics, and sitting quality assessment. Additionally, the platform integrates OpenAI's GPT-4o Large Language Model (LLM) to deliver personalized insights and recommendations based on users' historical posture data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.