Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41012896›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Every Step Counts-How Can We Accurately Count Steps with Wearable Sensors During Activities of Daily Living in Individuals with Neurological Conditions?

Florence Crozat, Johannes Pohl, Chris Easthope Awai, Christoph Michael Bauer, Roman Peter Kuster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Florence CrozatTherapy Science Lab, Lake Lucerne Institute, 6354 Vitznau, Switzerland.
Johannes PohlData Analytics & Rehabilitation Technology (DART), Lake Lucerne Institute, 6354 Vitznau, Switzerland.
Chris Easthope AwaiData Analytics & Rehabilitation Technology (DART), Lake Lucerne Institute, 6354 Vitznau, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3602-7841
Christoph Michael BauerTherapy Science Lab, Lake Lucerne Institute, 6354 Vitznau, Switzerland.
Roman Peter KusterTherapy Science Lab, Lake Lucerne Institute, 6354 Vitznau, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4189-2071

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable sensors provide objective, continuous, and non-invasive quantification of physical activity, with step count serving as one of the most intuitive measures. However, significant gait alterations in individuals with neurological conditions limit the accuracy of step-counting algorithms trained on able-bodied individuals. Therefore, this study investigates the accuracy of step counting during activities of daily living (ADL) in a neurological population. Seven individuals with neurological conditions wore seven accelerometers while performing ADL for 30 min. Step events manually annotated from video served as ground truth. An optimal sensing and analysis configuration for machine learning algorithm development (sensor location, filter range, window length, and regressor type) was identified and compared to existing algorithms developed for able-bodied individuals. The most accurate configuration includes a waist-worn sensor, a 0.5-3 Hz bandpass filter, a 5 s window, and gradient boosting regression. The corresponding algorithm showed a significantly lower error rate compared to existing algorithms trained on able-bodied data. Notably, all algorithms undercounted steps. This study identified an optimal sensing and analysis configuration for machine learning-based step counting in a neurological population and highlights the limitations of applying able-bodied-trained algorithms. Future research should focus on developing accurate and robust step-counting algorithms tailored to individuals with neurological conditions.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingNervous System DiseasesWearable Electronic DevicesAccelerometryAdultAgedAlgorithmsExerciseFemaleGaitHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedWalkingaccelerometeraccuracyactivities of daily livingalgorithm developmentinertial measurement unitmachine learningneurological populationpopulation-specific algorithmstep countvalidation

Identifiers

PMID41012896
PMCPMC12473868

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.