Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41012958›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Interference Field Control for High-Uniformity Nanopatterning: A Review.

Jingwen Li, Xinghui Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jingwen LiShenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518071, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0145-0268
Xinghui LiShenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518071, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 58762275142Shenzhen Science and Technology Program JCYJ20241202125343058Shenzhen Stable Supporting Program WDZC20231124201906001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interference lithography (IL) offers high throughput, excellent uniformity, and maskless patterning capabilities. Compared to other methods, IL enables large-area, cost-effective fabrication of periodic structures with subwavelength resolution, which is particularly valuable for sensing applications, enabling the development of more sensitive, high-resolution, and reliable sensors. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of IL from the perspective of optical field control. We first introduce the principles of interference field formation and summarize key system architectures, including Mach-Zehnder and Lloyd's mirror configurations, as well as advanced schemes such as multi-beam interference and multi-step exposure for complex pattern generation. We then examine how wavefront engineering, polarization modulation, and phase stabilization influence pattern morphology, contrast, and large-area uniformity. To address dynamic drifts caused by environmental perturbations, both passive vibration isolation and active fringe-locking techniques are discussed. For fringe-locking systems, we review methods for drift monitoring, control algorithms, and feedback implementation. These developments enhance the capability of IL systems to deliver nanoscale accuracy under dynamic conditions, which is essential for stable and high-performance sensing. Looking ahead, IL is evolving into a versatile platform for sensor-oriented nanofabrication. By integrating physical modeling, precision optics, and real-time control, IL provides a robust foundation for advancing next-generation sensing technologies with higher sensitivity, resolution, and reliability.

Indexed as

fringe lockinginterference lithographynanopatterning uniformityperiodic structurespolarization modulationwavefront engineering

Identifiers

PMID41012958
PMCPMC12473420

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.