ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Markerless Motion Capture Parameters Associated with Fall Risk or Frailty: A Scoping Review.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Lightweight Temporal Convolutional Network for Contactless SPPB-Aligned Functional Fall-Risk Stratification in Older Adults Using Monocular RGB Video.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Frailty (a syndrome resulting in reduced physical function) assessments and fall risk assessments rely heavily on in-person evaluations and subjective interpretation, limiting scalability and access. Markerless motion capture (MMC) offers a promising solution for remote, objective assessment, but key kinematic parameters associated with frailty and fall risk remain unclear. This scoping review synthesized evidence from MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL (inception to October 2024). Eligible studies used MMC to assess adults and compared outcomes to validated frailty or fall risk measures. Of 8048 studies, 39 met the inclusion criteria: 30 evaluated fall risk, 7 evaluated frailty, and 2 evaluated both, including 3114 participants (mean age 75.8; 42% male). Microsoft Kinect was used in 75% of the studies. An average of 23 features was extracted per study. Gait analysis was the most common MMC assessment for fall risk, identifying gait speed, stride length, and step width as key parameters. Frailty-related features were less consistent, with two studies identifying power, speed degradation, power reduction, range of motion, and elbow flexion time during a 20 s arm test. Future studies require standardization of methods and improved reporting of data loss. Despite the emerging nature of the field, MMC shows potential for the identification of fall risk and frailty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.