ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Point-Line-Area Paradigm: 3D Printing for Next-Generation Health Monitoring Sensors.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional printing technology is fundamentally reshaping the design and fabrication of health monitoring sensors. While it holds great promise for achieving miniaturization, multi-material integration, and personalized customization, the lack of a clear selection framework hinders the optimal matching of printing technologies to specific sensor requirements. This review presents a classification framework based on existing standards and specifically designed to address sensor-related requirements, categorizing 3D printing technologies into point-based, line-based, and area-based modalities according to their fundamental fabrication unit. This framework directly bridges the capabilities of each modality, such as nanoscale resolution, multi-material versatility, and high-throughput production, with the critical demands of modern health monitoring sensors. We systematically demonstrate how this approach guides technology selection: Point-based methods (e.g., stereolithography, inkjet) enable micron-scale features for ultra-sensitive detection; line-based techniques (e.g., Direct Ink Writing, Fused Filament Fabrication) excel in multi-material integration for creating complex functional devices such as sweat-sensing patches; and area-based approaches (e.g., Digital Light Processing) facilitate rapid production of sensor arrays and intricate structures for applications like continuous glucose monitoring. The point-line-area paradigm offers a powerful heuristic for designing and manufacturing next-generation health monitoring sensors. We also discuss strategies to overcome existing challenges, including material biocompatibility and cross-scale manufacturing, through the integration of AI-driven design and stimuli-responsive materials. This framework not only clarifies the current research landscape but also accelerates the development of intelligent, personalized, and sustainable health monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.