ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
AI-Enabled Microfluidics for Respiratory Pathogen Detection.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Sensing and Delivery Technologies for Nose-to-Brain Administration: From Nanocarriers to Sensor-Integrated Organ-on-Chips.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances in rapid detection technologies for zoonotic diseases: a one health-oriented review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Next-generation viral detection through AI-enhanced nanotechnology: advances, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Point of Care Testing, Rapid Next Generation Sequencing and Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric and Neonatal Healthcare: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, influenza, and tuberculosis, continue to impose a significant global health burden, underscoring the urgent demand for rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective diagnostic technologies. Integrated microfluidic platforms offer compelling advantages through miniaturization, automation, and high-throughput processing, enabling "sample-in, answer-out" workflows suitable for point-of-care applications. However, their clinical deployment faces challenges, including the complexity of sample matrices, low-abundance target detection, and the need for reliable multiplexing. The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) with microfluidic systems has emerged as a transformative paradigm, addressing these limitations by optimizing chip design, automating sample pre-processing, enhancing signal interpretation, and enabling real-time feedback control. This critical review surveys AI-enabled strategies across each functional layer of respiratory pathogen diagnostics: from chip architecture and fluidic control to amplification analysis, signal prediction, and smartphone/IoT-linked decision support. We highlight key areas where AI offers measurable benefits over conventional methods. To transition from research prototypes to clinical tools, future systems must become more adaptive, data-efficient, and clinically insightful. Advances such as sensor-integrated chips, privacy-preserving machine learning, and multimodal data fusion will be essential to ensure robust performance and meaningful outputs across diverse scenarios. This review outlines recent progress, current limitations, and future directions. The rapid development of AI and microfluidics presents exciting opportunities for next-generation pathogen diagnostics, and we hope this work contributes to the advancement of intelligent, point-of-care testing (POCT) solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.