ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Pixel-Level Segmentation of Retinal Breaks in Ultra-Widefield Fundus Images with a PraNet-Based Machine Learning Model.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Observation to Surgery: A Review of Literature and an Updated Algorithm for Acquired Retinoschisis and Schisis-Detachment.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Retinal breaks are critical lesions that can cause retinal detachment and vision loss if not detected and treated early. Automated, accurate delineation of retinal breaks in ultra-widefield fundus (UWF) images remains challenging. In this study, we developed and validated a deep learning segmentation model based on the PraNet architecture to localize retinal breaks in break-positive cases. We trained and evaluated the model using a dataset comprising 34,867 UWF images of 8083 cases. Performance was assessed using image-level segmentation metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, Intersection over Union (IoU), dice score, and centroid distance score. The model achieved an accuracy of 0.996, precision of 0.635, recall of 0.756, IoU of 0.539, dice score of 0.652, and centroid distance score of 0.081. To our knowledge, this is the first study to present pixel-level segmentation of retinal breaks in UWF images using deep learning. The proposed PraNet-based model showed high accuracy and robust segmentation performance, highlighting its potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.