ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Multi-Domain CoP Feature Analysis of Functional Mobility for Parkinson's Disease Detection Using Wearable Pressure Insoles.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Gait asymmetry in Parkinson's disease - a systematic review and meta-analysis (AsymmGait-Parkinson study).Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Multi-Task Wearable Parkinson's Disease Detection with a Pretrained Spatio-Temporal Graph Encoder and Task-Level Token Aggregation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI-Enabled Wearables for Motor Function Assessment and Rehabilitation in Parkinson Disease: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) impairs balance and gait through neuromotor dysfunction, yet conventional assessments often overlook subtle postural deficits during dynamic tasks. This study evaluated the diagnostic utility of center-of-pressure (CoP) features captured by pressure-sensing insoles during the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Using 39 PD and 38 control participants from the recently released open-access WearGait-PD dataset, the authors extracted 144 CoP features spanning positional, dynamic, frequency, and stochastic domains, including per-foot averages and asymmetry indices. Two scenarios were analyzed: the complete TUG and its 3 m walking segment. Model development followed a fixed protocol with a single participant-level 80/20 split; sequential forward selection with five-fold cross-validation optimized the number of features within the training set. Five classifiers were evaluated: SVM-RBF, logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), and Gaussian naïve Bayes (NB). LR performed best on the held-out test set (accuracy = 0.875, precision = 1.000, recall = 0.750, F1 = 0.857, ROC-AUC = 0.921) using a 23-feature subset. RF and SVM-RBF each achieved 0.812 accuracy. In contrast, applying the identical pipeline to the 3 m walking segment yielded lower performance (best model: k-NN, accuracy = 0.688, F1 = 0.615, ROC-AUC = 0.734), indicating that the multi-phase TUG task captures PD-related balance deficits more effectively than straight walking. All four feature families contributed to classification performance. Dynamic and frequency-domain descriptors, often appearing in both average and asymmetry form, were most consistently selected. These features provided robust magnitude indicators and offered complementary insights into reduced control complexity in PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.