ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Multi-Signal Acquisition System for Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring is essential for the early detection and prevention of cardiovascular diseases like hypertension. Recently, interest in continuous BP estimation systems and algorithms has grown. Various physiological signals reflect BP variations from different perspectives, and combining multiple signals can enhance the accuracy of BP measurements. However, research integrating electrocardiogram (ECG), photoplethysmography (PPG), and impedance cardiography (ICG) signals for BP monitoring remains limited, with related technologies still in early development. A major challenge is the increased system complexity associated with acquiring multiple signals simultaneously, along with the difficulty of efficiently extracting and integrating key features for accurate BP estimation. To address this, we developed a BP monitoring system that can synchronously acquire and process ECG, PPG, and ICG signals. Optimizing the circuit design allowed ECG and ICG modules to share electrodes, reducing components and improving compactness. Using this system, we collected 400 min of signals from 40 healthy subjects, yielding 4390 records. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the system's performance in BP estimation. The results demonstrated that combining pulse wave analysis features with the XGBoost model yielded the most accurate BP predictions. Specifically, the mean absolute error for systolic blood pressure was 3.76 ± 3.98 mmHg, and for diastolic blood pressure, it was 2.71 ± 2.57 mmHg, both of which achieved grade A performance under the BHS standard. These results are comparable to or better than existing studies based on multi-signal methods. These findings suggest that the proposed system offers an efficient and practical solution for BP monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.