ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Heterogeneity phenotypes in recurrent glioblastoma: a multimodal MRI-based spatial mapping framework for precision treatment.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Neuro-Oncology: A Narrative and Translational Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Hypoxia-targeted BOLD MRI signal heterogeneity as a complementary metric for glioblastoma characterization: a pilot study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- KATP Channel Expression Determines ONC212 Sensitivity via Mitochondrial Dysfunction and PERK/ATF4/CHOP Activation in Glioblastoma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Radiomics in glioblastoma recurrence: advances in prediction, localization, and differentiation from treatment-related effects.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Beyond morphology: imaging the glioblastoma microenvironment in the era of quantitative neuro-oncology.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo develop a multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based spatial mapping framework for quantitatively characterizing intratumoral heterogeneity in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM), identifying distinct imaging subregions, and classifying heterogeneity phenotypes predictive of treatment response and survival outcomes.
methodsA total of 140 rGBM patients were recruited and underwent standardized diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Pixel-wise colocalization of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and DCE-MRI features identified four Multimodal Imaging Subregions (MIS). Entropy and Moran's I quantified heterogeneity, and hierarchical clustering defined imaging phenotypes. Treatment response to 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (CCNU), bevacizumab (Bev) + stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), and Bev + CCNU was assessed by volumetric and component-level changes. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox models.
resultsMIS4, defined by low ADC and slow-rising enhancement, was consistently treatment-resistant. Three imaging phenotypes with distinct heterogeneity patterns demonstrated significant prognostic stratification across regimens. Phenotype A showed the best outcomes under Bev-based regimens, while Phenotype B responded better to CCNU. Imaging phenotypes independently predicted progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
conclusionThis framework enables spatially resolved, phenotype-based analysis of rGBM heterogeneity using routine MRI. Imaging phenotypes serve as non-invasive biomarkers to guide personalized treatment planning and outcome prediction in recurrent glioblastoma. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.