ArticleBMC biotechnology2025
In silico screening and in vitro biological evaluation reveal Queuine as a promising MAP4K4 inhibitor for treating pancreatic cancer.
Article in BMC biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains one of the deadliest cancer types, with limited success in treatment despite advances in research. MAP4K4 is overexpressed in pancreatic tumors and linked to disease progression, making it a promising target for PC therapy. This study aimed to identify bioactive nutraceutical molecules targeting MAP4K4 using molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and MM-GBSA calculations. The computational findings were validated through in vitro MTT cell viability assays and MAP4K4 enzyme ELISA tests. Queuine and Thiamine were identified as potent MAP4K4 inhibitors with comparable docking scores to the approved drug Gemcitabine. MD simulations confirmed stable binding for 100 ns (3 runs), with average binding free energy values of -50 kcal/mol for Queuine, -47 kcal/mol for Thiamine, and − 18 kcal/mol for Gemcitabine. In vitro assays showed that Thiamine was non-cytotoxic at high concentrations, while Queuine had a significantly lower IC50 (5.95 µM) compared to Gemcitabine (64.17 µM), making it nearly ten times more potent. MAP4K4 ELISA tests confirmed Queuine’s superior binding and enzyme inhibition compared to Gemcitabine. Synergy studies combining Queuine (0.25–1.25 µM) and Gemcitabine (0.05–2.5 µM) revealed strong synergistic effects, suggesting enhanced efficacy at lower doses. These findings highlight Queuine as a promising natural therapeutic agent for PC, with potential for combination therapy with Gemcitabine. Further in vivo studies are recommended to explore its therapeutic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.