ArticleBMC biotechnology2025
Evaluation of the pharmacological potential of Ganoderma lucidum against haemorrhagic and anticoagulant activities of Echis ocellatus venom.
Article in BMC biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toxicological profiling of venoms from ten major Chinese snakes: a mass spectrometry-based proteomic and multiroute assessment.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEchis ocellatus is a highly venomous snake that can cause serious medical complications due to the presence of toxic proteins in its venom. These proteins, such as echicetin and phospholipase A
objectiveThis study investigated the inhibitory effects of G. lucidum on haemorrhagic and anticoagulant activities induced by E. ocellatus venom, and identified its possible bioactive inhibitor compounds using in vitro, in vivo, and in silico methods.
methodsGanoderma lucidum was extracted using methanol in a standard procedure, and varying doses (20 and 40 mg) of the extract were tested against the biological activities E. ocellatus venom. Thereafter, the extract of the G. lucidum was subjected to Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis to identify its bioactive compounds. The identified compounds were docked against the catalytic active sites of echicetin and PLA2 proteins to determine the best inhibitor compound. The Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity (ADMET) properties of compounds were determined using the ADMETlab 2.0 web tool.
resultsThe extract caused 62.96 ± 1.03% and 59.25 ± 1.59% venom-induced haemorrhage inhibition at doses of 20 and 40 mg, respectively, while plasma clotting times were shortened to 132 and 163 s at 20 and 40 mg, respectively. The GC-MS identified 29 bioactive compounds from G. lucidum extract, out of which hesperidin had the highest docking scores of - 9.3 kcal/mol and - 9.9 kcal/mol against the catalytic sites of echicetin and PLA2 enzymes, respectively.
conclusionThe results indicate that G. lucidum has antivenom potential against E. ocellatus venom-induced toxic activities, and identified hesperidin as a promising compound for antivenom exploration against viper envenoming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.