ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
Has the new GP contract in Scotland reduced health inequalities? Qualitative evaluation of the views of general practitioners working in deprived areas.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundScotland has the widest health inequalities in western Europe and a well-documented inverse care law in general practice. Scotland introduced a new General Practitioner contract in 2018, reforming how care is delivered. Changes included expanding the primary care multidisciplinary team, and grouping practices into geographical clusters to improve quality of care for the local populations. A stated aim of the new contract was also to reduce inequalities in health. However, the effects of the reforms upon health inequalities have been little explored. This study aimed to analyse the views of General Practitioners working in deprived areas on the impact of the contract on health inequalities in Scotland.
methodsThis study involved a secondary analysis of qualitative data from one-to-one interviews with 11 GPs serving patients in deprived areas of Scotland. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.
resultsDespite some positive opinions on some aspects of the contract, GPs in deprived areas felt that the aim of reducing inequalities had not been achieved. Reasons for this were: (1) persisting barriers to engagement for patients in deprived areas (including poor access to services, lack of patient education about the reforms, centralisation of some services, and difficulties with remote consulting), (2) inadequate support to manage patients with complex problems (including difficulty in providing continuity of care, and limited resources for patients with specific comorbidities such as mental health and chronic pain), (3) clusters in areas of deprivation lacking capacity to address health inequalities (including lack of time, lack of training, and lack of data and evaluation), and (4) a lack of workforce and strategic planning in the new contract regarding deprivation (such as suitable resource allocation and recruitment of sufficient numbers of appropriate staff in practices in deprived areas). Two additional cross-cutting themes were identified, relating to lack of time and poor relationships.
conclusionsThe new Scottish General Practice contract has not achieved its aim of reducing health inequalities, according to General Practitioners working in deprived areas. Future iterations of the contract need to implement changes that will tackle the inverse care law and thus help reduce inequalities in health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.