Evidence mapPaperPMID 41013846Full record

ReviewMicrobiome2025

From gut to gamete: how the microbiome influences fertility and preconception health.

Sarah K Munyoki, Natalie Vukmer, Julie M Rios, Amanda Kallen, Eldin Jašarević

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah K MunyokiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Natalie VukmerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Julie M RiosDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Amanda KallenDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA.
Eldin JašarevićDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. eldin.jasarevic@pitt.edu.

Funding

Project IIIP50HD096723 · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · 2025 to 2025
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD096723NIDDK NIH HHS K01DK1121734NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK121734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global fertility rates continue to decline despite advancements in assisted reproductive technologies, highlighting a significant gap in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying preconception physiology. In this commentary, we review a growing body of work demonstrating that the microbiome plays a crucial yet underexplored role in women's reproductive health. This work has shown that microbial communities produce substrates that support metabolic, immune, and hormonal functions during this critical period, affecting fertility, pregnancy outcomes, and offspring health. Women with reproductive disorders, including endometriosis, polycystic ovarian syndrome, primary ovarian insufficiency, and recurrent pregnancy loss, harbor distinct microbial signatures. Animal studies provide key mechanistic insights, showing that disruption of microbiota accelerates ovarian aging, but translating these findings to human preconception health requires careful consideration. While these findings are compelling, this emerging field currently lacks a clear understanding of how microbial signals affect reproductive tissues through metabolites, immune responses, or hormonal pathways. We outline criteria for establishing microbial causation in preconception health, including sufficiency, necessity, specificity, and timing. Moving beyond correlations involves selecting appropriate models, focusing on key developmental windows, conducting longitudinal studies before conception, and investigating how specific microbial metabolites influence reproductive outcomes. Incorporating microbiome research into preconception care could lead to the development of new therapies and interventions. While the principles outlined here primarily address preconception reproductive health, they also offer a framework for microbiome research in general, emphasizing the need for a mechanistic understanding, timely interventions, and progress from association to causation in this rapidly evolving field.

Indexed as

FertilityGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsEndometriosisFemaleHumansPolycystic Ovary SyndromePregnancyReproductive Health

Identifiers

PMID41013846
PMCPMC12465865

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.