ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Evaluation of Improvement in Skin Laxity and Oiliness After Monopolar Radiofrequency Treatment: A Pilot Study Utilizing Multiple Assessment Tools.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Objective and subjective retrospective evaluation of XERF, a novel single-shot dual-frequency non-invasive monopolar radiofrequency.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Enhancement of Collagen and Elastic Fibers by Direct Contact Cooling-Based Monopolar Radiofrequency in a Minipig Model.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Improvement in Skin Laxity and Oiliness After Monopolar Radiofrequency Treatment: A Pilot Study Utilizing Multiple Assessment Tools.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadiofrequency (RF) therapy is a popular noninvasive skin-tightening method, yet objective evaluations of its effectiveness remain limited.
aimsThis study assesses RF therapy's impact on facial skin laxity and oiliness using a 3D skin analyzer, multi-parameter skin analysis, and histological analysis.
methodsThirty-two patients (skin types III-V) underwent full-face monopolar RF treatment, with follow-ups over 24 weeks. Clinical photographs, 3D imaging, and specialized probes measured elasticity and sebum levels. Skin biopsies were taken before and 2 months post-treatment. Improvement was assessed through patient questionnaires and dermatologist evaluations.
resultsSignificant improvements in jawline sagging and nasolabial folds were observed in 2D/3D images. Quantitative analysis confirmed RF-induced skin rejuvenation, with a statistically significant increase in skin radiance at 4 and 8 weeks. Sebum production decreased notably at 8 and 24 weeks, as confirmed by the sebum index. Elasticity improved, with increased viscoelasticity and reduced retraction time. Histological analysis revealed reduced dermal inflammation, decreased sebaceous gland volume, and enhanced collagen and elastic fiber density. At 2 months, 53.1% of patients reported over 50% improvement. No severe adverse events occurred.
conclusionMonopolar RF effectively enhances skin laxity by remodeling collagen and reorganizing elastic fibers. Histological findings and skin analyzer data support RF as a reliable, noninvasive treatment for improving skin firmness and reducing oiliness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.