ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2026
Urinary periostin as a novel non-invasive biomarker for kidney scarring in pediatric vesicoureteral reflux patients.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a common pediatric urological condition associated with kidney scarring, which can lead to hypertension, proteinuria, and chronic kidney disease. Current diagnostic methods, such as 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scans, are costly, involve radiation, and fail to detect early fibrosis. Urinary periostin, an extracellular matrix protein upregulated in kidney fibrosis, holds promise as a non-invasive biomarker for kidney scarring in VUR patients. This study aimed to evaluate urinary periostin as a biomarker for kidney scarring in children with VUR and compare its diagnostic performance with DMSA scans.
methodsThis prospective case-control study enrolled 60 children (35 males and 25 females) aged between 1 and 140 months (with mean (SD) of 43.7 (34.45)) with VUR (30 with kidney scarring [Scar+] and 30 without [Scar-]). Urinary periostin levels were measured via ELISA and corrected with urine creatinine. DMSA scans confirmed scarring. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis assessed periostin's diagnostic accuracy, and logistic regression identified predictors of scarring.
resultsUrinary periostin levels were significantly higher in Scar+ patients (27.4 ± 6.64 ng/mL) than in Scar- patients (18.1 ± 4.63 ng/mL, p < 0.001). ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.869, with a 21.5 ng/mL cutoff showing 80.0% sensitivity and 76.6% specificity. Periostin (OR 1.44, p < 0.001) was the only independent predictor of scarring. Periostin levels correlated with VUR grade (r = 0.63, p < 0.001).
conclusionsUrinary periostin is a highly sensitive and specific non-invasive biomarker for detecting kidney scarring in VUR, potentially reducing reliance on DMSA scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41014326What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.