ReviewESC heart failure2025
Early in-hospital treatment of acute heart failure. Part 2 of the international expert opinion series on AHF management.
Review in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Landmark clinical trials shaping contemporary guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Acute Heart Failure in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A State-of-the-art Review from an International Expert Group.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
- Early in-hospital treatment of acute heart failure. Part 2 of the international expert opinion series on AHF management.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute heart failure (AHF) remains a major global health challenge, contributing significantly to morbidity, mortality and healthcare resource utilization. It is one of the leading causes of hospitalization, with persistently high readmission rates underscoring the need for improved early management strategies. Despite its prevalence, clear and evidence-based guidance for the early evaluation and treatment of AHF is limited. Congestion is the primary reason for emergency admission, making rapid and effective decongestion a top priority, but diuretics are often underdosed in AHF patients. Medications proven to improve mortality are often not started. In this state-of-the-art review, we address this critical gap by outlining a practical, evidence-based framework for the early management of AHF. Key components include early identification of co-existing conditions, bedside haemodynamic profiling, a structured diagnostic approach incorporating both standard and individualized assessments, a stepwise pharmacologic diuretic strategy beginning with high-dose intravenous loop diuretics, and early in-hospital initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.