Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41017028›Full record

ReviewEmerging infectious diseases2025

Retrospective Analysis of Historical Listeria monocytogenes Clinical Isolates, New York, USA, 2000-2021

Hilal Samut, Damaris V Mendez-Vallellanes, Hannah Hoyt, Samantha E Wirth, Lisa Mingle, Brian D Sauders, Gregory A Deiulio, Alyssa W Dickey, Maria L Ishida, William J Wolfgang and 2 more

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hilal Samut
Damaris V Mendez-Vallellanes
Hannah Hoyt
Samantha E Wirth
Lisa Mingle
Brian D Sauders
Gregory A Deiulio
Alyssa W Dickey
Maria L Ishida
William J Wolfgang
Martin Wiedmann
Renato H Orsi

Funding

FDA HHS U19 FD007089FDA HHS U19 FD007122NCEZID CDC HHS U50 CK000423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used whole-genome sequencing data to investigate historical Listeria monocytogenes clinical (n = 1,046) and nonclinical (n = 1,325) isolates from New York, USA. Applying a threshold of <20 single-nucleotide polymorphism differences for single-linkage clustering, 321 clinical isolates clustered into 85 clusters ranging from 2-33 isolates per cluster. Fourteen clusters included isolates with outbreak codes (4 clusters with New York codes and 10 with multistate codes). Three New York outbreak codes were assigned to isolates that were genetically highly related and from cases <2 months apart. Fifteen clusters included isolates that were obtained >10 years apart; 33 clusters included isolates from the same or contiguous counties. Seventeen clusters included food and environmental isolates highly related to clinical isolates. These findings suggest that some listeriosis clusters can be local and span a long period, demonstrating the importance of investigating small, localized listeriosis cases with closely related isolates, even over long timeframes.

Indexed as

Listeria monocytogenesListeriosisDisease OutbreaksGenome, BacterialHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMaleNew YorkPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRetrospective StudiesWhole Genome SequencingbacteriacgMLSTclusterenteric infectionsepidemiologyfoodbornefood safetyListeria monocytogeneslisteriosisNew YorkoutbreakpersistenceREP strainssurveillanceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41017028
PMCPMC12483022

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.