Evidence mapPaperPMID 41017122Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025

Pharmacomicrobiomics.

Naomi Gronich, Naama Geva-Zatorsky, Rachel Herren, Libusha Kelly, Ziv Cohen, Haiying Zhou, Yi-Ching Chen, Khalid Shah, Talin A Robinson-Catala, Grecia Frisby and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Naomi GronichDepartment of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Clalit Health Services, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-4369-6813
Naama Geva-ZatorskyThe Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7303-854X
Rachel HerrenThe Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Cancer Research Center (RTICC), Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Libusha KellyDepartment of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7303-1022
Ziv CohenDepartment of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Haiying ZhouSimulations Plus, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Yi-Ching ChenCenter for Stem Cell and Translational Immunotherapy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Khalid ShahCenter for Stem Cell and Translational Immunotherapy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Talin A Robinson-CatalaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Grecia FrisbyDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Jason H KarnesDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5001-3334
Lisl ShodaSimulations Plus, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9310-0080

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral medications encounter gut commensal microbes that participate directly and indirectly in drug effects through metabolism, interactions with drug metabolites, or production of substrates that compete with drugs for drug-metabolizing enzymes, consequently influencing drug pharmacokinetics. The microbiota can also affect drug efficacy or toxicity by modulating the immune system; for example, variability in response to cancer immunotherapy, such as anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapies, is increasingly attributed to differences in gut microbial composition and function. These conditions indicate the need and opportunity to intentionally leverage the microbiome for drug effect; as such, the study of how intra- and inter-individual differences in the microbiome affect drug response has gained a definition termed pharmacomicrobiomics. While the need is clear, clinical studies evaluating pharmacomicrobiomic interactions are challenging due to microbiome variability, multiple potential confounders, no standardization of statistical and bioinformatics methods, and the reluctance of potential clinical study participants. In this review, we make the case for pharmacomicrobiomic clinical studies; for the use of modeling and simulation to provide a quantitative framework for data integration, hypothesis testing, and translational-to-late-stage clinical predictions; and the application of real-world data to support both using a within-subject comparison approach. We argue that an integrated and cohesive approach can address the large "inherent" inter-individual variability in the microbiome, attributed to factors such as age, lifestyle choices, environmental factors, chemical and biological exposures, and disease. In summary, there are many challenges to pharmacomicrobiomics research but also enormous potential to improve the development and utilization of pharmaceutical products.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsHumansModels, BiologicalPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID41017122
PMCPMC12641081

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.