ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
Pharmacomicrobiomics.
Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxycodone self-administration and genetic background exert community-specific effects in the gut microbiome.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Intra-tumoural microenvironment and bugs-based drug design: foreseeable future in oncology and immuno-oncology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Biohacking the human gut microbiome for precision health and therapeutic innovation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Harnessing the gut microbiome for precision therapeutics in heart failure.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral medications encounter gut commensal microbes that participate directly and indirectly in drug effects through metabolism, interactions with drug metabolites, or production of substrates that compete with drugs for drug-metabolizing enzymes, consequently influencing drug pharmacokinetics. The microbiota can also affect drug efficacy or toxicity by modulating the immune system; for example, variability in response to cancer immunotherapy, such as anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapies, is increasingly attributed to differences in gut microbial composition and function. These conditions indicate the need and opportunity to intentionally leverage the microbiome for drug effect; as such, the study of how intra- and inter-individual differences in the microbiome affect drug response has gained a definition termed pharmacomicrobiomics. While the need is clear, clinical studies evaluating pharmacomicrobiomic interactions are challenging due to microbiome variability, multiple potential confounders, no standardization of statistical and bioinformatics methods, and the reluctance of potential clinical study participants. In this review, we make the case for pharmacomicrobiomic clinical studies; for the use of modeling and simulation to provide a quantitative framework for data integration, hypothesis testing, and translational-to-late-stage clinical predictions; and the application of real-world data to support both using a within-subject comparison approach. We argue that an integrated and cohesive approach can address the large "inherent" inter-individual variability in the microbiome, attributed to factors such as age, lifestyle choices, environmental factors, chemical and biological exposures, and disease. In summary, there are many challenges to pharmacomicrobiomics research but also enormous potential to improve the development and utilization of pharmaceutical products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.