ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Age-Specific Pharmacology of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Error Traps in Pediatric Neuromuscular Block.Paediatric anaesthesia · 2026Review
- Muscle-Specific Differences in Neuromuscular Block and Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Review
- Narrative Review of the Role of Nondepolarizing Neuromuscular Blocking Agents in Anesthesia: Perspective 2026.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are essential in anesthesia, used primarily for intubation and synchronizing mechanical ventilation. They can be divided into depolarizing and non-depolarizing agents with an addition of reversal agents, which can be used to avoid residual muscle blockade. Their pharmacological properties vary among age groups due to physiological differences. In children, immature liver and kidney function, body composition, and immature neuromuscular junction influence drug properties. Elderly patients tend to have reduced organ function, more comorbidities, and greater vulnerability to stress. Ensuring anesthesia safety and preventing complications often requires adjusting doses and delivery regimens, which can be problematic, especially among inexperienced anesthesia personnel. To address this issue, we created this review to clarify dosage differences and their physiological bases. The article provides an overview of numerous clinical studies, including recent ones conducted on age-diverse patient populations, which, combined with an explanation of the pharmacological basis of NMBAs, is a valuable resource for anesthesiology with various levels of experience. The manuscript was based on 131 articles dating from 1987 to 2025, as well as the authors' knowledge and clinical experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.