ArticleMolecular plant pathology2025
The Two Tomato Ubiquitin E1 Enzymes Play Unequal Roles in Host Immunity.
Article in Molecular plant pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cryo-EM structures of UBA6 reveal mechanisms of E1-E2 specificity and dual FAT10/ubiquitin thioester transfer.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Ubiquitin-Mediated Proteolysis as a Regulator of the Plant Defense-Growth Balance.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Two Tomato Ubiquitin E1 Enzymes Play Unequal Roles in Host Immunity.Molecular plant pathology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plants typically encode multiple ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1s or UBAs), but their functional equivalence or divergence remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that the two tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) E1s, SlUBA1 and SlUBA2, differentially regulate development and immunity. Knockdown of SlUBA1 or SlUBA2 caused distinct growth and developmental defects in tomato, while silencing both genes resulted in severe abnormalities, rapid etiolation, and plant death within 5-7 weeks. Notably, silencing SlUBA2, but not SlUBA1, compromised plant immunity against the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst). SlUBA1 and SlUBA2 exhibited distinct charging efficiencies for E2s from groups IV (SlUBC32/33/34), V (SlUBC7/14/35/36), VI (SlUBC4/5/6/15) and XII (SlUBC22), with SlUBA2 showing significantly higher efficiency. Swapping the C-terminal ubiquitin-folding domains (UFDs) between SlUBA1 and SlUBA2 largely reversed their E2-charging efficiency for these groups. Furthermore, mutating a key residue (SlUBA2
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.