ReviewAmerican journal of hematology2026
Facts and Misfacts on D-Dimer Testing. Consensus Guidance From the Italian Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SISET).
Review in American journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk Prediction Models for Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- Exercise-induced changes in hemostasis markers in marathon runners: effects of enzyme supplementation and determinants.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Facts and Misfacts on D-Dimer Testing. Consensus Guidance From the Italian Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SISET).American journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Emerging Insights of Management of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
D-dimer defines degradation products derived from the proteolysis mediated by plasmin on cross-linked fibrin. The evidence-based use of D-dimer in some conditions has been consolidated. Currently, however, there is an entrenched prescription of D-dimer testing to screen otherwise healthy subjects that may induce prescribing physicians to start time-consuming diagnostic procedures that may generate patient anxiety/distress and often fail to reach meaningful conclusions for patients' management. To make things worse, the incidental finding of unexplained elevated D-dimer is often, and inadvertently, taken as an index of venous thromboembolism (VTE) that may induce unnecessary initiation of thromboprophylaxis. Finally, population studies showed that elevated D-dimer is variably associated with arterial thrombosis. However, the above studies do not allow establishing a direct causal relationship between elevated D-dimer and disease, which makes D-dimer measurement hardly applicable in individual patients. With this as background, the Italian Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis appointed a panel to prepare a guidance on the use of D-dimer based on the literature and expert opinion. The main conclusions of the panel can be summarized as follows: (i) D-dimer can be reliably used in combination with pre-test clinical probability to exclude VTE in symptomatic outpatients. (ii) It may help establish the optimal duration of secondary VTE prevention with vitamin K antagonists, although the panel felt that this area needs further investigation when dealing with direct oral anticoagulants. (iv) The use of D-dimer in combination with the pre-test probability score can be used to safely rule out acute aortic syndromes in the emergency setting without further imaging tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.