ArticleMedeniyet medical journal2025
PARP-1 rs1136410 Polymorphism and Gastrointestinal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Cancer-Type and Ethnic-Specific Associations.
Article in Medeniyet medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding "Medeniyet medical journal · 2026Article
- Comment on "Medeniyet medical journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 ( Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, BIOSIS, LILACS, CNKI, CBM, Wan Fang, and other regional databases up to February 1, 2025. Eligible case-control studies assessing the association between PARP- 1 rs1136410 polymorphism and CRC or GC were included. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated under five genetic models using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Results: Thirteen case-control studies were included, comprising 3.591 patients and 5.433 controls. For GC (8 studies; 1,784 cases and 2,521 controls), significant associations were observed under multiple genetic models: allele comparison (C vs. T: OR=2.01, 95% CI 1.04-3.91, p=0.039), homozygous comparison (CC vs. TT: OR=1.77, 95% CI 1.24-2.52, p=0.002), heterozygous comparison (CT vs. TT: OR=1.36, 95% CI 1.18-1.57, p<0.001), and recessive comparison (CC vs. CT+TT: OR=1.54, 95% CI 1.08-2.20, p=0.017). No significant association was detected for CRC (5 studies; 1.807 cases and 2.912 controls). Ethnic subgroup analysis revealed a protective effect against CRC in Caucasians but increased susceptibility in Asians. Conclusion: The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.