ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2025
Characterizing Lipoprotein(a) in Children With New-Onset Diabetes and Implications for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Children with diabetes mellitus (DM) have an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), a risk potentially exacerbated by elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)). While other cholesterol parameters are screened in this population, Lp(a) is often overlooked despite being an independent CVD risk factor. Lp(a) levels are historically believed to not change over an individual's life and are genetically determined, but newer literature suggests variation. Objective: This study investigated Lp(a) levels and their relationship with glycated hemoglobin A Methods: Children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 years with incident DM had baseline Lp(a) and lipid profiles. Repeat Lp(a) and HbA Results: Seventy-six children were included for evaluation: 76% with type 1% and 23% type 2 DM. Baseline median (Q1-Q3) Lp(a) was 43.3 nmol/L (13-73.7 nmol/L), 17 of which were elevated (≥75 nmol/L). Of the 22 participants with follow-up, 8 were abnormal: A total of 4 whose baseline Lp(a) were abnormal remained so and 4 with normal levels became abnormal. A positive correlation was found between 3-month Lp(a) values and HbA Conclusion: Children with DM have abnormal Lp(a) levels at a prevalence of approximately 20%, so this should be considered in CVD risk stratification. Further, observed Lp(a) fluctuations suggest value in serial Lp(a) assessments due to nongenetic influences. Without Lp(a) quantification, CVD risk characterization in children with DM may be inaccurate and should be considered for a comprehensive assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.