ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2025
MEN1-Related Neuroendocrine Tumors Show c-MET Overexpression.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cabozantinib and temozolomide in patients with advanced progressive neuroendocrine tumors: a phase 2 study.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Prognostic and Predictive Significance of Selected Gene Mutations in Pancreatic and Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Approximately 50% to 70% of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) die of duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). While c-MET inhibitors in combination with antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy have been shown to result in longer progression-free survival in patients with sporadic NETs, data regarding their efficacy in patients with MEN1-related NETs are lacking. Objective: We sought to characterize c-MET expression in MEN1-related NETs and evaluate its association with clinicopathologic characteristics. Methods: Forty-three tumors from 22 genetically confirmed patients with MEN1-related metastatic NETs were identified. Of these, 15 of 22 (68%) patients had distant metastases while the remaining 7 of 22 had locoregional metastases. Results: c-MET expression was assessed in these tumors via immunohistochemistry. A total of 19 of 43 (44%) were primary tumors (duodenum, pancreas, stomach) while the remaining were metastases. c-MET expression was scored as strongly positive in 3 of 43 (H-score >50), weakly positive in 6 of 43 (H-score: 10-50), and negative in 34 of 43 (H-score <10) tumors. All 3 tumors with strong positive c-MET expression were from patients with a distinctly aggressive clinical course. The 6 tumors with weakly positive c-MET expression were from patients with stable disease, including 4 with distant metastases. Of the 13 patients with all tumors negative for c-MET expression, all but 1 had stable disease. Age at initial NET diagnosis; tumor site, type or grade; number of sites of distant metastases; total number of surgeries for NETs; or the stability of overall tumor burden did not predict c-MET expression. Conclusion: Our findings suggest a role for c-MET inhibition in personalizing therapy for patients with MEN1-related NETs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.