ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025
Neutrophil extracellular traps in ischemic stroke: mechanisms, clinical implications, and therapeutic potential.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune response to DNA and RNA: structural insights, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic targeting.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Neutrophil-targeted nanoparticles delivering sivelestat alleviate cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by suppressing NETosis.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Extracellular Vesicles in the Gut-Vascular-Brain Axis: A Missing Mechanistic Link Between IBD and Stroke Risk.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Discovery and validation of programmed cell death-associated key biomarker genes in ischemic stroke via ssGSEA/WGCNA and LASSO-SVM-RFE.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Neutrophil α-defensin-1 is present in human stroke thrombi and induces NETosisFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Neutrophil extracellular traps in retrieved thrombi and functional outcome after stroke thrombectomy.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Inflammatory Response Indices in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with and Without Reperfusion Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and disability, with many patients failing to benefit from reperfusion therapies due to lysis-resistant thrombus formation and severe neuroinflammation. This highlights an urgent need to target the fundamental mechanisms linking these two processes. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)-web-like structures of DNA and cytotoxic proteins-have emerged as a critical mediator of stroke pathology. While essential for host defense, their dysregulated formation in the cerebral microvasculature drives a vicious cycle of tissue injury. This review synthesizes evidence demonstrating that NETs are not mere bystanders but active drivers of stroke pathology. We dissect the core mechanisms by which they mediate three primary detrimental effects: (1) promoting stable, lysis-resistant thrombi, which directly contributes to poor clinical outcomes; (2) compromising blood-brain barrier integrity; and (3) amplifying the neuroinflammatory cascade. Furthermore, we evaluate the clinical utility of NETs as powerful biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis, and we critically analyze emerging therapeutic strategies aimed at dismantling them. While targeting NETs with agents like DNase I or PAD4 inhibitors holds immense promise, we argue that significant translational challenges-such as ensuring therapeutic specificity and defining the optimal treatment window-must be overcome. In conclusion, targeting the thrombo-inflammatory functions of NETs represents a paradigm shift from a purely fibrin-centric view of stroke, opening new avenues for developing more effective therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.