ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Enhancing patient-reported outcomes in stroke care: a path to improved well-being.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) present a valuable opportunity to enhance stroke care by capturing symptoms and experiences often missed by traditional outcome measures like the modified Rankin Scale. Despite similar clinician-reported scores, stroke survivors frequently experience varied symptoms across physical, emotional, and social domains that significantly impact their well-being. This commentary examines the evolving role of PROs in stroke care, highlighting their potential to guide personalized treatment strategies. We present cases demonstrating how PROs reveal meaningful clinical differences among seemingly similar patients and discuss implementation challenges in clinical practice. While barriers exist, including time constraints and the complexity of post-stroke symptoms, solutions such as specialized recovery clinics and digital health programs could help bridge the gap between identifying patient needs and delivering targeted interventions. As stroke care evolves, incorporating PROs may unlock new opportunities for improving outcomes by addressing the comprehensive needs of stroke survivors throughout their recovery journey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.