ReviewClinical kidney journal2025
Pathways to translation for nanomedicine in nephrology.
Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nanomaterial-Based Precision Drug Delivery for Advanced Nephrology Therapy: A Systematic Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Pooled it
- The Application of Nanomaterials in Kidney Stone Disease: Emerging Strategies for Early Diagnosis, Targeted Therapy, and Prevention.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Nanoparticles in the Treatment of Renal Fibrosis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Kidney diseases are a substantial worldwide health burden, with high mortality and increasing incidence. Despite their prevalence, substantial gaps remain in the clinic in both diagnostics and therapeutics. Many novel treatments have failed in clinical trials or fallen out of use in the clinic due to side effects and poor efficacy, in large part due to poor therapeutic profiles in the kidney. Nanomedicines have begun to emerge as a potentially promising diagnostic or therapeutic delivery system. Based on their physicochemical properties, such as size, shape, surface chemistry, and so on, some nanotechnologies can target the kidneys. However, as of yet, no kidney-specific nanomedicines have reached clinical translation. While the field of renal nanomedicine is in its early stages and growing, some potential obstacles to translation include poor preclinical models, challenges in manufacturing scale-up, clinical trial design and the cost of translation. Here, we overview the current state of the kidney-targeting nanomedicine field and outline a potential framework for clinical translation. We focus on the paths of US Food and Drug Administration- approved nanomedicines and suggestions from other nanomedicine fields to inform our key considerations for translational success. We also highlight the importance of academic and clinical collaboration with industry and federal regulators. Several investigational technologies are just now at the cusp of scaling towards the clinic and we therefore aim to support this momentum for improving the lives of patients with kidney diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.