ArticleCureus2025
Integrating Wearable Sensor Data With an AI-Based, Protocol-Flexible Triage Platform to Accelerate Decision-Making During the Golden Hour of Combat Casualty Care.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Time Comparison of Machine Learning-Enabled Devices for Measuring Compensatory Reserve Status.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Validation of a Wearable Photoplethysmography-Based Sensor for Compensatory Reserve Measurement Monitoring in Simulated Human Hemorrhage.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Rapid, accurate triage within the first "golden hour" on the battlefield is critical to survival, yet existing wearable sensors and manual protocols operate in isolation, delaying care and creating inconsistent priority ratings across military and civilian systems. We therefore designed a vendor-agnostic, protocol-flexible platform that ingests live biometric streams from military-grade wearables, applies an artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced hybrid decision engine, and returns colour-coded casualty categories under any standard (e.g., MARCH (Massive hemorrhage, Airway, Respiration, Circulation, and Hypothermia/Head injury), Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), START(Screening Tool to Alert to the Right Treatment), SALT (Sort, Assess, Life-saving Interventions, Treatment/Transport)) in real time. Methods The planned platform will comprise four layers: (i) Data Ingestion, which normalizes ECG, heart-rate, blood-pressure, and oxygen saturation (SpO₂) signals to Open mHealth/Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) schemas via BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy) or WebSockets; (ii) Secure Transport, which encrypts packets with Transport Layer Security (TLS) 1.3 and uses store-and-forward buffering through message queuing telemetry transport (MQTT)/Kafka brokers; (iii) Triage Engine, which merges continuous machine-learning severity scores with dynamically loaded guideline definitions (JSON (JavaScript Object Notation)/YAML (YAML Ain't Markup Language)) and rule-based overrides; and (iv) Presentation, which delivers one-tap guideline selection and actionable prompts to medics while providing a geo-tagged command dashboard. Validation will combine bench tests on synthetic and de-identified Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) datasets with randomized field-simulation trials that compare manual versus AI-augmented triage, measuring time to triage, protocol concordance, and medic cognitive load (National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index(NASA-TLX)). Results (projected) We anticipate at least a 30% reduction in triage time, agreement rates of 85% or higher with expert assessments across multiple protocols, and significant decreases in medic workload. Conclusion A dynamic, standards-based artificial intelligence (AI) triage platform could harmonize military and civilian casualty care, accelerate golden-hour decision-making, and improve multinational interoperability. Planned live-exercise evaluations and open-source protocol libraries are expected to facilitate rapid adoption and continuous refinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.