ArticleCureus2025
Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Patients Receiving Intravitreal Injection Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema, and Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) are leading causes of vision loss treated with intravitreal injections. The impact of these chronic treatments on patients' vision-related quality of life (QoL) and treatment satisfaction (TS) across different diseases remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate and compare vision-related QoL and TS in patients with nAMD, DME, or RVO undergoing intravitreal therapy, and to identify factors associated with QoL. Methods Single-center cross-sectional study including 88 patients (58 with nAMD, 22 DME, 8 RVO) receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or corticosteroid injections (≥3 prior injections). Vision-related QoL was assessed with the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25), and TS was measured with the Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MacTSQ). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of both eyes was measured (logMAR), and a complete ophthalmological examination was performed. We compared VFQ-25 and MacTSQ scores among diagnostic groups and analyzed correlations between QoL, TS, and systemic factors. Multivariable linear regression identified independent predictors of QoL. Results Mean VFQ-25 composite score was 65.1 ± 20.7 (out of 100), indicating moderate QoL impairment, with no significant difference between nAMD, DME, and RVO groups (p = 0.40). Mean MacTSQ score was 81.9 ± 13.5, reflecting high treatment satisfaction, also with no difference among diagnoses (p = 0.14). Worse BCVA (higher mean logMAR of both eyes) and older age were each significantly associated with lower QoL (Spearman r ≈ -0.50 and r ≈ -0.48; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, older age (p = 0.004), presence of dyslipidemia (p = 0.03) or depression (p = 0.04), and worse BCVA (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of lower VFQ-25 scores. Diagnostic group, bilateral treatment, and other comorbidities were not independent predictors of QoL. Treatment satisfaction was uniformly high across all groups and was not significantly correlated with age or QoL. Conclusions Patients with nAMD, DME, and RVO receiving intravitreal injections report similar levels of vision-specific QoL impairment and high satisfaction with treatment. Preservation of visual acuity is the key determinant of better QoL, underscoring the importance of effective therapy and adherence. Additionally, older age and systemic factors such as dyslipidemia and depression adversely affect QoL, highlighting the need for a multidisciplinary management approach. These findings suggest that regardless of retinal disease etiology, maintaining vision and addressing comorbidities are critical to optimizing patient-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.