ArticleCureus2025
Community-Engaged Medical Student Elective to Improve Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIndividuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) face multiple barriers to inclusion throughout life. One barrier is the medical knowledge and biases of adult healthcare providers with diagnoses traditionally associated with childhood. Medical school curricula have limited content related to IDD, and students have limited opportunities to engage with community organizations during their clinical years. Methods: We created a one-month clinical elective to address medical students' attitudes and knowledge regarding individuals with IDD using experiential learning. Students saw adult patients in our primary care clinic with a variety of IDD diagnoses and spent 30% of their time at community sites engaging with individuals with IDD in nonmedical settings. A survey of 38 attitudinal questions (Likert-scale) and a 48-item knowledge exam were administered before and after the elective. Results: Of the 47 participants, 42 (89%) completed the paired instruments between 2018 and 2022. Of the attitudinal items, nine resulted in a more positive direction post-elective (p < 0.05). Respondents indicated receiving adequate training so that they felt increased comfort, p < 0.001, r = 0.86 (large effect), and more competent to care for a person with IDD (p < 0.001, r = 0.85). Based on a composite score of a 48-question knowledge exam, post-scores were higher than pre-scores (p < 0.001) and Cohen's d = 0.90 (large effect). Conclusion: The creation and implementation of a medical student elective that combines clinical experience with community engagement had a significant impact on knowledge and attitudes toward individuals with IDD. Community engagement should be considered as a mechanism to enhance other clinical electives and break down attitudinal barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.