ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2025
Swin transformers are robust to distribution and concept drift in endoscopy-based longitudinal rectal cancer assessment.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DUAL CROSS-ATTENTION SIAMESE TRANSFORMER FOR RECTAL TUMOR REGROWTH ASSESSMENT IN WATCH-AND-WAIT ENDOSCOPY.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2026Article
- Tumor-anchored deep feature random forests for out-of-distribution detection in lung cancer segmentation.Transactions on machine learning research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endoscopic images are used at various stages of rectal cancer treatment starting from cancer screening and diagnosis, during treatment to assess response and toxicity from treatments such as colitis, and at follow-up to detect new tumor or local regrowth. However, subjective assessment is highly variable and can underestimate the degree of response in some patients, subjecting them to unnecessary surgery, or overestimating response that places patients at risk of disease spread. Advances in deep learning have shown the ability to produce consistent and objective response assessments for endoscopic images. However, methods for detecting cancers, regrowth, and monitoring response during the entire course of patient treatment and follow-up are lacking. This is because automated diagnosis and rectal cancer response assessment require methods that are robust to inherent imaging illumination variations and confounding conditions (blood, scope, blurring) present in endoscopy images as well as changes to the normal lumen and tumor during treatment. Hence, a hierarchical shifted window (Swin) transformer was trained to distinguish rectal cancer from normal lumen using endoscopy images. Swin, as well as two convolutional (ResNet-50, WideResNet-50), and the vision transformer architectures, were trained and evaluated on follow-up longitudinal images to detect LR on in-distribution (ID) private datasets as well as on out-of-distribution (OOD) public colonoscopy datasets to detect pre/non-cancerous polyps. Color shifts were applied using optimal transport to simulate distribution shifts. Swin and ResNet models were similarly accurate in the ID dataset. Swin was more accurate than other methods (follow-up: 0.84, OOD: 0.83), even when subject to color shifts (follow-up: 0.83, OOD: 0.87), indicating the capability to provide robust performance for longitudinal cancer assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.