Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018917›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2025

AI-driven preoperative risk assessment in kidney cancer surgery: A comparative feasibility study of machine learning models.

Julia Mühlbauer, Luise Gottstein, Luisa Egen, Caelan Haney, Alexander Studier-Fischer, Evangelia Christodoulou, Giovanni E Cacciamani, Keno März, Lena Maier-Hein, Stephan Maurice Michel and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Julia MühlbauerDepartment of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0503-0925
Luise GottsteinDepartment of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University Germany.
Luisa EgenDepartment of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University Germany.
Caelan HaneyDepartment of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University Germany.
Alexander Studier-FischerDepartment of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University Germany.
Evangelia ChristodoulouGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Heidelberg Germany.
Giovanni E CacciamaniUSC Institute of Urology, Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medecine University of Southern California (USC) Los Angeles CA USA.
Keno MärzGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Heidelberg Germany.
Lena Maier-HeinGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Intelligent Medical Systems Heidelberg Germany.
Stephan Maurice MichelDepartment of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University Germany.
Allison QuanDivision of Intelligent Systems and Robotics in Urology (ISRU) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany.
Karl-Friedrich KowalewskiDepartment of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2931-6247

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Preoperative risk stratification in renal tumour surgery is essential to enable risk-adjusted postoperative patient monitoring. Machine learning (ML) models predicting major complications (MCs) and acute kidney injuries (AKIs) following partial (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) have not been made, nor have they been compared with traditional logistic regression models. Design setting and participants: A total of 963 patients who underwent PN and RN between January 2017 and March 2023 at the University Medical Center Mannheim were included. The dataset consisted of 30 variables of interest- 18 descriptive and 12 predictor variables, which allowed for 7 predictor variables per event. The dataset was pre-processed, and ML models were created for MC and AKI. The selected models included Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Stochastic Gradient Boosting, Neural Networks (NNs) and Elastic Net Logistic Regression models (ENETs). Results and limitations: For major complications, the NN model had the best model fitting, with an AUROC of 0.762 [95%CI 0.611-0.912], a sensitivity of 0.86 [95%CI 0.80-0.92] and a Brier score of 0.17 [95%CI 0.11-0.23]. For AKI, the best fit model was created using a NN with an AUROC of 0.717 [95%CI 0.611-0.823], a sensitivity of 0.82 [95%CI 0.74-0.90] and a Brier score of 0.24 [95%CI 0.17-0.31]. The best performing models for both outcomes outperformed the ENETs. Conclusions: The ML models provide valuable information for preoperative risk stratification of patients undergoing renal tumour surgery. This study suggests that NNs are the most appropriate models to stratify patients regarding the occurrence of MCs and AKIs, respectively. The models are made publicly available for reproducibility.

Indexed as

ComplicationsKidney cancerKidney functionMachine LearningNephrectomyPrognosis modelRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41018917
PMCPMC12463572

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.