ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2025
Effect Analysis of Extracellular Vesicles in the Treatment of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia via Different Drug Delivery and Administration Routes.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inhalable extracellular vesicles as cell-free therapeutics for chronic respiratory disease.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are emerging as nanoscale, cell-free therapeutics for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a chronic lung disease in premature infants characterized by underdeveloped alveoli and abnormal blood vessel formation. This review exhibits how different EV delivery methods influence therapeutic effects in BPD. Intra-tracheal administration of EVs enables localized pulmonary delivery, which may improve treatment efficiency via reducing inflammation and promoting lung development. Intravenous delivery provides systemic anti-inflammatory effects requiring higher doses because of lung's blood vessel barriers. Intraperitoneal administration requires higher dosages to produce comparable effects and shows lower drug accumulation in the lungs. Intragastric administration often results in poor absorption due to the digestive environment. The distribution of EVs in the body is largely dependent on delivery methods. Nebulized and tracheal administrated EVs primarily concentrate in the lungs, whereas intravenous EVs tend to distribute in the liver and spleen. Mechanistically, EVs reduce oxidative stress and cell damage by influencing important biological pathways like TGF-β1/Smad3 and PTEN/PI3K/Akt. Although previous studies in neonatal animal models demonstrated that EVs are safe and promising, clinical translation of EVs requires standardized production, optimized dosage, non-invasive administration method, and long-term safety verification. Future efforts are suggested to focus on neonate targeting, biomarker-guided clinical trials of EVs in treating BPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.