ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Real-world efficacy of MiniMed™780G recommended settings (glycemic target 100 mg/dL, active insulin time 2 hours) in youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mind-glucose control interplay in type 1 diabetes: management of exam-related stress using the MiniMed™ 780G insulin pump among high school students.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Article
- Insulin delivery characteristics and glycemic control in older adults with type 1 diabetes using the Minimed™ 780G system: a real-world analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Despite growing evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of the MiniMed™ 780G recommended settings (Glucose Target 100 mg/dL and Active Insulin Time 2 hours), their adoption in routine practice remains limited, mainly due to concerns about hypoglycemia. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of switching to these settings in pediatric and young patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal analysis in children and young adults using MiniMed™780G system at our center. Patients who switched from their initial settings to a glucose target of 100 mg/dL and an active insulin time of 2 hours for clinical indications were included. Data were retrospectively collected 3 months after switch. Glycemic metrics were compared over the 14 days before the switch (T0) and at 1 month (T1), and 3 months (T3). Results: Ninety-one patients with a mean age of 17.89y were included, 81.3% of whom already had a glucose target of 100 mg/dL at baseline. Therefore, in most cases the primary change was reducing AIT from 3 to 2 hours. After switching to the recommended settings, Time in Range (TIR) significantly increased (p<0.001) at T1 (71.9% Conclusions: Switching to the recommended MiniMed™780G settings, driven primarily by AIT reduction in most patients, was safe and effective, improving glycemic control without increasing hypoglycemia. These findings support broader use of these settings in pediatric and young adult patient with type 1 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.