Evidence mapPaperPMID 41019345Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Reproductive aging in biological females: mechanisms and immediate consequences.

Yasin Ali Muhammad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The HIV Reservoir and Immune Landscape Across the Life Course of Women: Implications for Cure Strategies.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yasin Ali MuhammadDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive aging is a dynamic, systemic process that encompasses more than the decline in ovarian function. It involves coordinated changes across neuroendocrine, immune, metabolic, and mitochondrial systems. Central to this transition is the depletion of ovarian follicles, leading to reduced estradiol and progesterone production and subsequent disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. This hormonal shift remodels hypothalamic signaling networks - particularly those involving kisspeptin, neurokinin B (NKB), and GABA - driving alterations in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulsatility, vasomotor symptoms (VMS), and loss of reproductive cycling. Simultaneously, chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction further accelerate both ovarian and neural aging. Estrogen receptor subtypes (ERα and ERβ) play critical and region-specific roles in mediating tissue responses to hormonal withdrawal, contributing to variability in symptom expression and therapeutic outcomes. Genetic, cultural, and environmental factors - such as diet, endocrine disruptors, and APOE genotype - further influence the trajectory and severity of menopause-related changes. Emerging treatments, including neurokinin receptor antagonists and ERβ-selective modulators, offer targeted alternatives to conventional hormone therapy. This review frames menopause not as a singular endocrine endpoint but as a neuroimmune transition, highlighting the need for mechanistic insight and personalized therapeutic approaches to improve health outcomes during reproductive aging.

Indexed as

AgingMenopauseOvaryReproductionAnimalsFemaleHumansHypothalamo-Hypophyseal Systemagingendocrine systemhypothalamasmenopause (estrogen withdrawal)ovarian follicle cells

Identifiers

PMID41019345
PMCPMC12463648

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.