ArticleAJPM focus2025
A Caregiver Survey of Driving Readiness in Teens Born Extremely Preterm.
Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Teens born extremely preterm (defined as a gestational age of <28 weeks) are at a higher risk of cognitive and physical disabilities, potentially affecting their ability to learn to drive safely. This exploratory study surveyed caregivers to obtain their perceptions of driving readiness in teens born extremely preterm. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of caregivers of teens (aged 14-18 years) residing in Ohio who were born extremely preterm was conducted to assess teen interest and progress in obtaining a driver's license, reasons for their lack of progress, and caregiver involvement in helping their teen to learn to drive. Results: The sample included 60 caregivers of teens distributed across 4 age groups based on license eligibility. Most teens (87%) had a history of a neurodevelopmental or medical disorder. Only 9 (30%) of 30 teens aged <18 years who were age-eligible for a temporary permit had obtained one, and only 1 (7%) of 14 teens who was age-eligible for a probationary license had obtained one. Rates of neurological disorders and concerns that the teen lacked maturity to drive or would get lost were significantly higher in 25 age-eligible teens who were not driving than in the 20 teens who were driving ( Conclusions: Delays in progressing toward obtaining a driving license are common in teens born extremely preterm. The findings from this study describe these delays and provide information on caregiver concerns and involvement in driving. Future research is needed to characterize and improve driving readiness in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.