Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41019541›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025

Proposing a unified Mediterranean diet score to address the current conceptual and methodological challenges in examining adherence to the Mediterranean diet.

Nahla Hwalla, Antonia Trichopoulou, Jacques Delarue, Felice Adinolfi, Furio Brighenti, Barbara Burlingame, Roberto Capone, Sandro Dernini, Maroun El Moujabber, Marcela González-Gross and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nahla HwallaDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Antonia TrichopoulouAcademy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Jacques DelarueER 7479 SPURBO, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brest, Brest, France.
Felice AdinolfiDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna-Alma Mater, Bologna, Italy.
Furio BrighentiDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Barbara BurlingameRiddet Institute, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Roberto CaponeInternational Center for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM), Valenzano, Italy.
Sandro DerniniInternational Center for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM), Valenzano, Italy.
Maroun El MoujabberInternational Center for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM), Valenzano, Italy.
Marcela González-GrossImFINE Research Group, Department of Health and Human Performance, Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte-INEF, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Yari VecchioDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna-Alma Mater, Bologna, Italy.
Nour MassouhDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Farah NajaDepartment of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, Research Institute of Medical and Health Sciences (RIMHS), University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A plethora of studies has documented the benefits of the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) for both human and environmental health. At the core of these investigations lies the assessment of adherence to it. In this manuscript, we aim to examine existing original scores used to assess adherence to the MedDiet and propose a framework for a unified score to address current challenges and complement the existing scores. A literature search was conducted to identify original MED scores, excluding those derived from earlier scores. A total of nineteen original scores were identified and examined. At the conceptual level, across existing scores, the following issues were identified: inconsistencies in food items, lack of holistic lifestyle approaches with focus on food-based components, limited cultural specificity, absence of sustainability evaluations, and regional focus solely on economically developed countries. At the methodological level, the majority of scores were based on cutoffs set by the population-specific distributions of dietary intake. Such cutoffs may be in discordance with the dietary recommendations of the different food groups considered. In addition, the definition of "adherence" is inconsistent across the scores, making the interpretation and comparability of the prevalence of adherence another methodological challenge. As a result, a framework for a Unified Mediterranean diet Score (UMEDS) is proposed. This framework consists of 10 food groups (whole grains, fruits, vegetables, dairy products, fish, legumes, olive oil, nuts and seeds, poultry, and red meat). These food groups are the common denominators of a traditional Mediterranean diet. In addition to the food-related components, the UMEDS also addresses physical activity, sleep, conviviality, and culture-specific food consumption (mainly composite dishes based on olive oil). For each of these items, evidence-based cut-offs were proposed. The total score for the UMEDS ranges from 0 to 22 with higher scores indicating a higher adherence (≤12 poor adherence, 13-17 moderate adherence, ≥18 good adherence). By integrating key components of dietary intake, lifestyle habits, and cultural practices, the UMEDS provides a comprehensive unified approach that aligns with global health guidelines and reflects the true spirit of the Mediterranean diet, rooted in food, lifestyle, culture, lifestyle, and traditional knowledge and practices.

Indexed as

cultural dietary practicesdiet adherencelifestyleMediterranean dietunified Mediterranean diet score

Identifiers

PMID41019541
PMCPMC12463607

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.