ReviewAJOG global reports2025
Biomarkers predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes in women living with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in AJOG global reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically review the literature on associations between antenatal biomarkers and adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with BMI ≥30 kg/m². Study eligibility criteria: Interventional and observational studies comparing pregnancy outcomes amongst women with a pre- or early-pregnancy (<20 weeks' gestation) BMI ≥30 kg/m² according to presence or amount of any antenatally measured biomarker were included. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Risk of bias assessment was performed on included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Risk of Bias Tool. A narrative synthesis of eligible studies was constructed and data were meta-analysed, where possible, using random effects models. Certainty of evidence was assessed by GRADE rating. Results: Total 49 studies were included in the review, representing >500 different biomarkers in 7479 pregnancies across 16 countries. Adiponectin was the only biomarker with sufficient data to meta-analyse with respect to the composite outcome. Lower adiponectin was associated with increased risk of the composite outcome (SMD -0.52, 95% CI -0.63, -0.41; Conclusions: Decreased adiponectin and increased insulin are associated with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with BMI ≥30 kg/m². However, the low number of studies available for inclusion and low certainty of evidence mean that biomarker-based risk-stratification within pregnant women with BMI ≥30 kg/m² is not currently feasible. Further research is required to find ways of reliably targeting investigations during maternity care towards the subset of women living with obesity who are at highest risk of adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.