ArticleRadiology case reports2025
Intravascular lithotripsy-assisted carotid artery stenting in heavily calcified lesions: A case series.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), although considered off-label for carotid interventions, has proven to be beneficial for the treatment of heavily calcified lesions and may improve outcomes in select patients unsuitable for open repair. We present 3 consecutive cases of IVL-assisted carotid artery stenting (CAS) performed via transfemoral and transradial approaches in patients with severe internal carotid artery calcification. All patients were considered poor candidates for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Technical success was achieved in all cases, with no neurological complications noted during the perioperative period, 30-day follow-up (with 6-month follow-up in 2 patients since 1 was lost to follow-up). All procedures were performed using distal filter protection alone without flow reversal, in contrast to most published series. IVL may broaden CAS applicability for patients with circumferential calcification and combined high anatomic/physiologic surgical risk who are not candidates for CEA. Further studies are warranted to evaluate long-term outcomes and optimal patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.